Skip to content

Re-reading – Good or Bad?

August 16, 2010

Cyril Connolly once said: ‘Literature is the art of writing something that will be read twice; journalism what will be read once.’

It is not surprising our every-day writing is closer to journalism than literature.  A guiding principle is that our reader should not have to re-read our work. If it is not understood on the first pass then the reader has to make sense of our confusion by investing time and effort in re-writing  so that it is understood.

The other message in Connolly’s remark is that the implied pleasure in reading literature is in contrast to the throwaway character of journalism.  Not necessarily. We write to be read once because, as business readers, we read out of necessity not pleasure. But it can be enjoyable as well as  informative. The difference between fiction and non-fiction, we are told, is that fiction gives us an experience, non-fiction gives us information.  But persuasive writing steps beyond this divide and takes us into another, more artful space. (See Readers are people too). As ever, in good business writing, nothing is simply that black and white.

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: